12th Crime Congress

Final version of the NGO joint statement

Posted in Uncategorized by 12thcrimecongress on 17 April 2010

Here attached is the final version of the Joint Statement of NGOs to the high-level segment at the Twelfth Crime Congress. The final text was agreed at an open meeting for NGOs held yesterday evening.

Organizations that would like to be associated with the statement and are represented by someone who has the authority to sign on behalf of that organization should send an e-mail to valentina.varbanova@unodc.org.

In order to avoid confusion, the draft text that was uploaded yesterday has been removed.

20100418_NGO Statement final

Advertisements
Tagged with: ,

NGO statement for the high-level segment

Posted in Uncategorized by 12thcrimecongress on 16 April 2010

A statement prepared through an open, consultative process will be made at the high-level segment scheduled to start tomorrow afternoon, as a way of putting forward the concerns of the NGOs represented at the Congress. In the statement, the following areas are addressed: victims, juveniles, responding to crime, transnational organized crime, and research and evaluation.

Tagged with: ,

NGOs get together for their first coordination meeting

Posted in Uncategorized by 12thcrimecongress on 12 April 2010

Some 90 participants from NGOs, research institutions and academic entities, as well as volunteer report writers and interpreters, met this afternoon for a first get-together. It was an opportunity for everyone to get information from Mirella Dummar-Frahi of UNODC on how to best get their voice heard by Member States in the Plenary. Mirella also suggested that NGOs identify one organization, ideally one that has been accredited by the Economic and Social Council, to give a message at the high-level segment that will start on the afternoon of Saturday, 17 April.

 Other practical advice was given by Gary Hill, who has been facilitating the ancillary meetings, on how the schedule of meetings would be run and on the kind of assistance he could provide (room allocation, presentation equipment, interpretation services etc.).

During the question-and-answer session and after the meeting, people exchanged information on their respective presentations and the work of their organizations. For many people, this is their first time at a United Nations congress. Others, however, have been attending Congresses and sessions of the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice for years. For them, in the words of one participant, these events are “like reuniting with a big family. I end up doing a lot of hugging”.

 NGO coordination meetings will be held daily at 9 a.m. in the Cocal room (third floor of the congress centre).

Can NGOs and civil society really have an impact through UN conferences?

Posted in Uncategorized by 12thcrimecongress on 9 April 2010

It’s a question I’ve often asked myself. Sometimes the answer seems, unequivocally, “yes!”, but other times I am less sure. While there is no doubt that civil society (NGOs, think tanks, loose groups of citizens) make valuable contributions, I wonder whether they are really able to shake up the discourse between governments. The meetings of the G8 and the World Trade Organization, for example, are so often accompanied by violent protests that the distance between “ordinary” citizens and Governments seems insurmountable.

At the two crime congresses organized by the United Nations that I’ve been involved in, I have been surprised by the degree to which NGOs are integrated in conference events. This seems particularly true at this edition of the Congress, as civil society but also the United Nations and certain Government organizations are all involved in the ancillary meetings.

To explore the issue of NGO influence, I e-mailed Gary Hill, who has played a key role in organizing the involvement of non-governmental entities in the Congress, and Mirella Dummar-Frahi, UNODC Civil Affairs Officer.

When I asked Gary whether NGOs can really influence the discussion, he wrote: “YES! Official UN resolutions, conventions and standards for the transfer of sanctions, victims and restorative justice are just a few of the issues which originated in the NGO community and have become part of official UN documents and policies”. And Mirella stresses that civil society’s participation in the international debate “is crucial to bring reality and experience to policymakers and to report what actually happens on the ground”.

As Gary reminds us, “the United Nations General Assembly and the Crime Commission have made it very clear that input from NGOs and civil society is critical if the UN crime prevention and criminal justice programme is to have an impact in making our world safer and more humane”.

Let’s see what happens at the Congress next week.